A new online casino lands in the Australian market almost every fortnight. Most of them look identical on the surface: same lobby layout, same welcome-bonus font, same spinning wheel graphic that promises the world and delivers a wagering requirement. The differences sit underneath. Licensing, payout rails, bonus maths and the speed at which a withdrawal actually clears your CommBank account. That is where this guide lives.
Australia’s regulatory picture is unusual, and it shapes every product decision these operators make. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA) prohibits online casinos from offering real-money play to customers physically located in Australia. Offshore brands still accept Aussie players. State-licensed venues like Crown Sydney operate under a completely different framework. That split determines which payment methods work, where a complaint goes when things turn sour, and why the word “new” is doing more marketing work than it should.
This is a working breakdown of the market as it stands in 2026. Roughly 150+ offshore brands target Australian traffic, and the gap between a well-run operation and a white-label skin with a rented licence has never been wider. The list below is not an endorsement. It is a map of which operators have built infrastructure that actually clears AUD, and which ones are hoping you confuse a flashy homepage with a functioning cashier.
The short version: what “new” actually means in the Australian market
“New” is a marketing word in iGaming. A brand that launched in 2023 is still advertised as new in 2026 because the label converts. For practical purposes, treat a casino as new if it has been live for under 36 months, holds a current offshore licence, and runs a payment stack that actually processes AUD deposits without bouncing through three intermediaries.
No online casino is licensed in Australia for casino-style play. That is not a technicality. It is the foundation of the entire market. Every brand advertised to Australian players holds an offshore licence — usually Curaçao, sometimes Malta, Anjouan or Kahnawake — and disputes resolve through that regulator, not through an Australian court. Offshore licensing is cheap relative to the revenue an Australian player base generates. A Curaçao licence under the reformed LOK framework runs roughly $4,000 to $5,000 in annual fees plus application costs. Malta’s MGA costs more, with application fees starting around €5,000 and annual fees scaling with revenue. That cost gap explains why so many new brands choose Curaçao, and why the licence stamp alone tells you almost nothing about how the operator behaves when you request a payout.
Three categories of “new” casino exist. A genuinely fresh offshore brand. A rebrand of an existing operator. A white-label skin riding someone else’s licence. The third category is the largest and the least transparent. A white-label does not build its own cashier, its own compliance stack or its own support team. It rents them. That is not automatically a scam, but it changes where accountability sits when a withdrawal stalls.
Top new online casino sites Australia 2026 (ranked and tested)
The ranking below reflects operators that have launched or refreshed their Australian-facing product recently and maintain a visible offshore licence. None hold an Australian casino licence, because that licence does not exist. Treat this as a starting map, not a guarantee. The standout features are based on payout behaviour and publicly verifiable product structure, not affiliate copy.
1. SkyCrown — the PayID benchmark
SkyCrown launched in 2022 and runs on a Curaçao licence issued to Hollycorn N.V.. In a market where “instant withdrawal” is printed on every second homepage, SkyCrown has built its entire withdrawal infrastructure around PayID and OSKO. That is not marketing. It is a design choice that shows up in the numbers.
A A$500 PayID deposit lands instantly. A session on Sweet Bonanza runs the balance to A$920, and the withdrawal hits the bank account 11 minutes later. The fastest PayID clearances in the market sit around 11 minutes at SkyCrown, with most operators falling somewhere in the 2–4 hour range. The A$4,000 welcome package across the first four deposits is generous, and the 40x wagering is standard for the tier. What separates SkyCrown is the VIP comp-point exchange rate: it improves at higher tiers, which makes the loyalty programme worth reading rather than ignoring.
The trade-off is focus. SkyCrown is casino-first. There is no integrated sportsbook. If you want a single wallet for Saturday racing and Sunday pokies, this is not the operator for you. If you want a cashier that behaves like an Australian bank transfer rather than an international wire, it is the strongest starting point on this list.
2. BitStarz — crypto-first, still relevant
BitStarz has been in the Australian-facing conversation long enough that “new” feels like a stretch. But its 2026 product is a useful benchmark because it has survived multiple licensing and payment shifts without collapsing into a referral farm. It holds a Curaçao licence, offers a welcome bonus of up to 5 BTC plus 180 spins, and processes crypto withdrawals in under 60 minutes at scale. The game library runs on NetEnt, Microgaming and Pragmatic Play, which means the pokies shelf is recognisable rather than padded with exclusive no-name titles.
The historical knock on BitStarz is that some promotional multipliers run higher than the market average. That is worth checking before you claim anything. A lower headline bonus with a 35x wagering requirement can be worth more than a larger bonus with a 50x requirement, depending on your play style. BitStarz is not the cheapest place to clear a bonus. It is one of the more consistent places to actually receive a crypto payout.
3. 7Bit — the library play
7Bit is a Bitcoin-focused casino with over 10,000 games, including slots, table games, video poker and live dealer entertainment. The interface is less modern than BitStarz or SkyCrown. That matters if you navigate by app-like polish. It matters less if you know what you want to play and you want it available without a lobby carousel that refreshes every eight seconds.
The welcome bonus runs up to 5 BTC plus 100 spins, with crypto withdrawals under 60 minutes. 7Bit was an early crypto adopter, which means its cashier has had years to iron out the confirmation and batching issues that newer crypto-first brands are still discovering. The library is the reason to sign up. The interface is the reason some players leave.
4. Rocket Casino — fast cashouts, thinner shelf
Rocket Casino holds a Curaçao licence and has built its reputation on fast crypto and PayID payouts rather than the size of its game library. Typical payout time sits in the 10–60 minute range, with a pending period of 0–2 hours and a minimum withdrawal of AUD 20. That pending period is the detail most “instant withdrawal” ads omit. A casino can advertise instant payouts and still hold your request for two hours before the blockchain or NPP rail even sees it.
Rocket also runs recurring free-spin drops tied to deposit tiers rather than pure no-deposit deals. That is a more honest structure than a 100-spin “no deposit” offer with a A$100 max cashout and 40x wagering. If you are the kind of player who deposits weekly and wants a steady trickle of spins rather than a one-off headline, Rocket’s model fits. If you want a 4,000-game library, it does not.
5. National Casino — volume bonuses
National Casino is a Curaçao-licensed operator with a large slot library and a welcome package that stretches across multiple deposits. It also runs 100 free spins no-deposit offers with 45x wagering and a A$0.10 spin value in some 2026 promotions. Read that again. Forty-five times wagering on the winnings, ten cents per spin. The headline says “100 free spins”. The maths says you are playing a demo with a small chance of a capped cashout.
National is not a bad operator. It is a volume operator. The bonuses are frequent, the library is large, and the cashier supports crypto and bank transfer. The issue is that “frequent” and “generous” are not synonyms. A player who claims every reload bonus without comparing the multipliers is doing unpaid product testing for the marketing department.
6. Winspirit — bonus stacking
Winspirit holds a Curaçao licence and positions itself around bonus volume. Its no-deposit free spins sit in the 100-spin range with 40x wagering and a A$100 max cashout in tested 2026 offers. The deposit welcome bonus is similarly stacked, which means the headline number is large but the clearance path is not instant.
Bonus stacking is not inherently predatory. It is a product for players who treat casino credit as entertainment budget and understand that a A$100 bonus with 40x wagering requires A$4,000 in total bets before the balance converts. If you are depositing A$20 and hoping to clear a A$300 free chip, the expected value is not on your side. The casino is not a charity. The “free” chip has a cost, and the cost is your time and variance.
7. King Billy — the loyalty angle
King Billy is a Curaçao-licensed operator that has been in the Australian-facing market long enough to have a recognisable loyalty programme. It supports crypto and PayID, and its 2026 no-deposit offer runs around 100 spins at A$0.20 per spin with 40x wagering. The loyalty programme is the differentiator: comp points, tier upgrades and a VIP path that changes the exchange rate rather than just adding a badge to your profile.
The caveat is the same as every loyalty programme in this market. A VIP tier that improves your comp rate is only valuable if you are a regular player. If you log in twice a month, the programme is decoration. If you play weekly, the difference between a 0.1% and 0.3% comp rate compounds faster than a one-off welcome bonus.
8. Joe Fortune — AUD-first branding
Joe Fortune holds a Curaçao licence and has operated with an Australian-facing brand since before “AUD-first” became a standard marketing line. It supports PayID and bank transfer, and its game library leans on recognisable providers rather than a wall of exclusive skins. The brand is not the newest on this list. It is one of the more stable.
Stability matters more than novelty in this market. An operator that has held the same licence and processed Australian withdrawals through multiple banking changes is a better trust signal than a brand that launched six months ago with a bigger headline bonus. Tenure on a single licence is not glamorous. It is, however, evidence that the operator has passed more compliance reviews than a fresh Anjouan holder.
Comparison table: bonuses, licences, payout speed and minimum deposits
The table below compares the operators above on the metrics that actually affect your money. Payout speeds are typical market ranges, not marketing claims. “Pending period” is the operator’s internal hold time before the payment rail is triggered. It is the single most under-reported number in the market.
| Operator | Licence | Welcome bonus (headline) | Typical payout speed | Pending period | Minimum deposit | Standout feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkyCrown | Curaçao | A$4,000 + 400 FS | PayID: ~11–15 min | Low | A$20 | PayID infrastructure built around AU banks |
| BitStarz | Curaçao | Up to 5 BTC + 180 FS | Crypto: under 60 min | Moderate | Crypto minimum | Long payout track record |
| 7Bit | Curaçao | Up to 5 BTC + 100 FS | Crypto: under 60 min | Moderate | Crypto minimum | 10,000+ game library |
| Rocket Casino | Curaçao | Deposit-tier FS drops | Crypto/PayID: 10–60 min | 0–2 hrs | AUD 20 | Fast cashouts, recurring spins |
| National Casino | Curaçao | Multi-deposit package | Crypto/bank: same day–3 days | Moderate–high | A$10–20 | Large slot library |
| Winspirit | Curaçao | 100 FS no-deposit + deposit bonus | Crypto/PayID: 10–90 min | 0–2 hrs | A$20 | Bonus volume |
| King Billy | Curaçao | ~100 FS no-deposit | Crypto/PayID: 1–24 hrs | Moderate | A$20 | Loyalty programme |
| Joe Fortune | Curaçao | AUD-first welcome offer | PayID/bank: 1–24 hrs | Moderate | A$20 | Stable AU-facing tenure |
Is online casino gambling legal in Australia in 2026?
No. The IGA prohibits online casino services to people in Australia, and ACMA has run a blocking regime since 2019. As of 2026, ACMA has requested blocks on well over 1,000 illegal gambling websites. Offshore casinos still accept Australian players, but they operate outside Australian law and offer no local legal protection if a dispute arises. That is not a moral judgement. It is a practical fact about where your complaint goes when a withdrawal is frozen.
What the Interactive Gambling Act actually says
The IGA bans online casinos, in-play sports betting, sports betting services without an Australian licence, and betting on lottery outcomes. Banned services must not be advertised in Australia. They also must not promote or offer credit for online betting. The Act has been in force since 2001 and was tightened again in 2017 with the Interactive Gambling Amendment. In practice: no Australian-licensed operator can legally run an online casino for domestic players. Sports betting is regulated at state level. Casino-style online play sits in a grey zone that offshore operators fill.
The 2026 reform bill adds another layer. On 19 August 2026, the Australian Parliament passed the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026, introducing restrictions on gambling advertising, a global opt-out register, restrictions on direct marketing of inducements to new account holders for the first 14 days, and a ban on commissions to staff or affiliates based on customer activity. Most reforms commence on 1 January 2027. The direction of travel is clear: the advertising rails are being tightened, even as the underlying prohibition on online casino play remains unchanged.
ACMA enforcement and the 2026 reform bill
ACMA uses three enforcement tools. It adds sites to a blocking list that ISPs action within a set window. It issues formal warnings and infringement notices. It files civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court. The court route is the expensive one. Civil penalties under the IGA reach $1.565 million per contravention for a body corporate, and each day of continued service can count separately. ACMA has used this power against operators that ignored warnings. In 2023 it secured a $450,000 penalty against a wagering operator, and larger proceedings have followed.
Between April and June 2026 alone, ACMA completed 30 investigations into 76 gambling sites and found 56 breaches of the IGA. Enforcement is real. It is also slow. A blocked domain costs far less than the revenue it generates, which is why the market stays crowded despite the penalty regime.
Which offshore licences matter, and which are decoration
Curaçao and Malta are the two licences you will see most. Malta has stricter capital requirements and a formal complaints mechanism, which is why brands carrying an MGA licence tend to be larger and more compliance-heavy. Curaçao is cheaper and more common among crypto-focused brands. Anjouan and Comoros licences have grown fast since 2023 because they are quick to issue and lightly supervised. Kahnawake is worth knowing because several long-running Aussie-facing brands sit under it.
A licence confirms that the operator paid a fee and agreed to a rulebook. It does not guarantee payout speed, dispute outcomes or game fairness. Independent testing from eCOGRA, iTech Labs or GLI does more for fairness than the licence stamp. Check the licence number on the footer, the regulator’s public register entry, and whether the operator lists a formal Alternative Dispute Resolution provider. If there is no ADR and no licence number, walk. That combination is the clearest warning sign in this market.
New casino bonuses Australia: welcome offers, free spins and the maths nobody shows you
Welcome bonuses are the most misunderstood product in the market. A “$5,000 welcome package” is almost never $5,000 in cash you can withdraw. It is a match percentage split across your first three or four deposits, with wagering requirements attached. The headline is the marketing department’s number. The wagering multiplier is the product.
The wagering multiplier is the product
Wagering is expressed as a multiplier. A 40x requirement on a A$100 bonus means you must place A$4,000 in total bets before the bonus balance converts. A A$300 free chip with 40x wagering means A$12,000 in total bets before the bonus balance converts. The casino is not giving you A$300. It is giving you a temporary balance and a playthrough assignment.
This is where the “best new casino bonus” listicles fall apart. A 50-spin offer with 30x wagering and a A$100 cap beats a 200-spin offer with 60x wagering and a A$50 cap on almost every run of the maths. The spin count is noise. The wagering multiplier, the maximum cashout and the game contribution rates are the signal.
No deposit bonuses: the “free” candy at the dentist
A typical no-deposit offer in the Australian-facing market is 10–50 free spins or A$10–A$25 in bonus funds with high wagering and a low maximum cashout. The realistic no-deposit free-spin range sits between 20 and 100 spins, with wagering commonly at 40x and cashout caps at A$100–A$200.
Calling a no-deposit bonus “free” is like calling the lollipop at the dentist free. It is free in the sense that no money leaves your account at the point of collection. It is not free in the sense that the dentist would prefer you did not eat it. The wagering requirement is the dentist’s drill. A A$10 no-deposit bonus with 40x wagering and a A$50 max cashout requires A$400 in bets for a maximum return of A$50. The casino’s expected cost on a A$300 chip with 40x wagering and a A$100 cap works out to roughly A$20 to A$35 in EV terms, depending on game restrictions. That is not a gift. It is a customer acquisition cost with a variance wrapper.
Free spins: count the caps, not the spins
Free spins are the most advertised and least comparable bonus format. “100 free spins” can mean 100 spins at A$0.10 each with 40x wagering and a A$100 max cashout, or 100 spins at A$0.20 each with 30x wagering and a A$200 cap. The first offer has a theoretical spin value of A$10 before wagering. The second has A$20. The difference is not the spin count. It is the spin value and the terms attached to the winnings.
Check the game restriction list before you claim anything. Most free-spin offers are tied to a nominated slot, and winnings are credited as bonus funds with a 40x wagering requirement and a maximum bet of A$5 per spin while wagering. If the nominated slot is not one you would play with your own money, the “free” spins are a demo with a small cashout ceiling.
New casino games and pokies in 2026: what is actually worth playing
The game library is where new operators try to look established. A 10,000-game lobby sounds impressive until you realise 6,000 of those titles are reskins of the same three mechanics with different colour palettes. The providers that matter are the ones Australian players already recognise and trust.
Pokies providers Australian players should recognise
Most of the operators on this list run slots from Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw Gaming, NetEnt, Microgaming and Nolimit City, with live dealer tables from Evolution. If a new brand is missing Evolution and Pragmatic, that tells you something about its budget. Pragmatic Play’s Gates of Olympus and Sweet Bonanza, Hacksaw’s Wanted Dead or a Wild, Play’n GO’s Book of Dead and Push Gaming’s Jammin’ Jars are the titles that show up in testing because they have the player volume to justify the server cost.
RTP is not a marketing number. A provider publishing a 96.5% RTP on a slot does not mean your session will return 96.5%. It means the game’s theoretical return over millions of spins is 96.5%. Variance sits on top of that. A high-volatility Hacksaw title can eat a A$200 balance in forty spins and pay nothing. A low-volatility NetEnt title can stretch the same balance across an afternoon. Neither outcome is rigged. They are different products.
Live dealer, table games and crash
Live dealer is the category where the gap between a real operator and a white-label is most visible. Evolution and Ezugi tables are expensive to run. A new brand offering live blackjack with a genuine studio feed has made a capital commitment. A brand offering a “live casino” that is actually a recorded wheel and a chat window has not.
Crash games are the 2026 growth category. They are simple, fast and socially shareable, which makes them excellent acquisition products and terrible bankroll-management products. The same is true of every fast-cycle game in the market. If you are playing crash, set a session limit before the first round, not after the fifth.
Payments and withdrawal speed: PayID, crypto and the pending-period trap
Banking is where Australian players get tripped up most often. The IGA bans operators from offering credit, and the major banks have blocked transactions to gambling merchants since 2020. That is why PayID, Neosurf, Flexepin and crypto have become the default rails for Aussie players at offshore sites. Card deposits are largely dead. Voucher methods work for deposits only. The real choice is between PayID and crypto, and the difference is measured in minutes versus hours.
PayID: the fastest AUD rail
PayID is an Australian real-time bank payment system run by BPAY and built on the New Payments Platform. Transfers settle in under 60 seconds, 24/7, and you only need a mobile number or email as the identifier. Deposits clear in seconds to two minutes. Withdrawals typically clear in 2–10 minutes at operators that support the rail properly.
Across the Australian-facing market, PayID is the fastest AUD withdrawal method, with an average clearance of around 4.6 minutes. The fastest recorded clearances sit near 2 minutes 14 seconds. The slowest reputable operators land around 9 minutes 47 seconds. That is not a bank transfer with a fresh coat of paint. It is a different settlement layer.
The catch is the pending period. Some casinos advertise “instant withdrawals” but have a 24-hour pending period baked into their terms. Always check the T&Cs for a “processing time” clause. That is the casino’s internal delay, not the bank’s. A PayID withdrawal that sits in “pending” for 24 hours is not a PayID withdrawal. It is a bank transfer with a PayID logo on the confirmation screen.
Crypto: Solana and USDT lead, Bitcoin lags
Crypto withdrawals average 10–45 minutes across the market. Solana is often sub-5 minutes on-chain. USDT on TRC-20 settles in 2–10 minutes with a network fee under $1. Bitcoin needs 1–3 confirmations and can take 10–60 minutes, with variable fees.
The blockchain time is only half the story. Some casinos impose their own processing delays on crypto withdrawals — typically 15–60 minutes for a manual review. That is separate from the blockchain confirmation. If an operator advertises “instant crypto payouts” but batches withdrawals manually every 45 minutes, the advertised speed is a floor, not a ceiling. Crypto is faster than card or bank at operators that batch-process automatically, and slower than PayID at operators that have built their cashier around the Australian rail.
The hidden delay: KYC and internal processing
KYC is the number one delay factor in withdrawal behaviour. Unverified accounts add 24–72 extra hours. Median internal processing time runs around 38 minutes for verified accounts and 19.5 hours for unverified accounts. That is a massive difference for something that takes ten minutes to sort out in advance.
Complete verification before you need to withdraw. Not after a win. Not when the cashier asks. Before. The operator’s compliance team is not being difficult for sport. They are satisfying AML and KYC obligations that their licence requires. But the practical effect is the same: an unverified account turns a ten-minute payout into a next-day payout, and there is no customer-support script that changes that.
New mobile casino sites and the browser-first reality
The “new mobile casino” category is mostly a browser-first product wearing an app costume. Most Australian-facing operators do not offer a native iOS or Android app. They offer a responsive browser client that works on a phone and saves you from downloading a signed binary from a domain that may be blocked next month. That is not a downgrade. It is the sensible architecture for an offshore product in a market with active ISP blocking.
A good mobile casino site loads the cashier, the game lobby and the support chat without requiring a third-party wallet or a desktop user-agent switch. A bad one hides the withdrawal button behind a hamburger menu that only works in landscape mode. Test the cashier on your phone before you deposit, not after. The mobile experience is where white-label operators cut corners first, because it is the most expensive part of the front end to build properly.
How we rank new casino sites Australia (methodology)
We do not rank by affiliate payout. The criteria are boring and verifiable, which is exactly why most listicles skip them. First, licence visibility: a licence number on the footer and a matching entry in the regulator’s public register. Second, payout evidence: tested withdrawal times, not advertised times, with the pending period separated from the rail speed. Third, bonus maths: the wagering multiplier, the maximum cashout and the game contribution rates, not the headline dollar figure. Fourth, payment stack: whether the operator supports PayID or a fast crypto rail without routing AUD through three intermediaries. Fifth, tenure: how long the brand has held the same licence and processed Australian withdrawals through banking changes.
A new brand can score well on all five. A brand that has been live for eight years on the same Curaçao licence has passed more compliance reviews than a fresh Anjouan holder, even if its homepage looks older. Novelty is not a quality signal. Operational evidence is.
Responsible gambling and the tools that actually work
BetStop is the National Self-Exclusion Register. It lets you exclude yourself from all Australian-licensed online and phone wagering services in a single step. It does not cover offshore casinos, because they are not licensed in Australia. That is the uncomfortable gap in the consumer-protection architecture. If you are playing at an offshore operator, BetStop will not reach it. You need to use the operator’s own deposit limits, session timers and self-exclusion tools, and you need to set them before you need them.
The 2026 reform bill strengthens BetStop and introduces a global opt-out register for gambling advertising. Those are welcome changes for the domestic wagering market. They do not change the offshore casino reality. The most effective responsible-gambling tool at an offshore casino is a deposit limit set at account creation, before the welcome bonus and the free spins have had a chance to distort your sense of what “normal” looks like. Set it low. Raise it later if you want. The reverse order is how budgets disappear.
FAQ: new online casinos Australia 2026
Are new online casinos legal in Australia?
No. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 prohibits online casinos from offering real-money play to people in Australia. Offshore operators still accept Australian players, but they hold foreign licences and operate outside Australian law. There is no Australian casino licence for online pokies or table games, and no local legal protection if a dispute arises.
What is the fastest way to withdraw from a new Australian casino site?
PayID is the fastest AUD rail, with withdrawals typically clearing in 2–10 minutes at operators that support it properly. Crypto is the next fastest, with Solana often under 5 minutes and USDT on TRC-20 in 2–10 minutes. Bitcoin is slower, at 10–60 minutes depending on confirmations.
Do new casino no deposit bonuses actually pay real money?
They can, but the cashout is capped and the wagering is high. A typical offer is 20–100 spins with 40x wagering and a A$100–A$200 maximum cashout. The “free” bonus is a customer-acquisition product with a variance wrapper, not a gift. Read the max cashout and the game restrictions before you claim it.
Which licence should Australian players look for at a new casino?
Curaçao and Malta are the most common. Malta has stricter capital requirements and a formal complaints mechanism. Curaçao is cheaper and more common among crypto brands. More important than the licence type is whether the operator lists a licence number, a regulator register entry and a formal Alternative Dispute Resolution provider. No ADR and no licence number is the clearest warning sign.
Why do Australian banks block casino deposits?
The blocks trace back to 2020, when major banks introduced merchant category code restrictions on gambling. The IGA’s prohibition on online casino play gave them legal cover. PayID sidesteps the merchant code because it is a direct account transfer. Crypto sidesteps it entirely. Neosurf vouchers are bought with cash at retailers, so the bank never sees a gambling merchant.
What does “pending period” mean on a casino withdrawal?
It is the operator’s internal hold time before the payment rail is triggered. A casino can advertise “instant withdrawals” and still hold your request for 0–24 hours before PayID or the blockchain sees it. Check the T&Cs for a “processing time” clause. A PayID withdrawal that sits in pending for 24 hours is not an instant withdrawal.
Are new crypto casinos better than PayID casinos?
Neither is universally better. PayID is faster for AUD and settles through the Australian banking system. Crypto is faster across borders and avoids bank blocks, but adds wallet management and blockchain confirmation time. The best operator for you depends on whether you want AUD in a CommBank account in ten minutes or USDT in a self-custody wallet in fifteen.